글 목록

프로필

내 사진
서울 서초구 반포대로 14길 30, 센추리 412호. TEL: 010-6350-1799 이메일:jawala.lee@gmail.com. Attorney at Law, Tax, Patent. Lee,Jae Wook is a member of the Korean Bar Association and Illinois Bar Association. Licensed to practice in KOREA and U.S.A., Illinois. Attorney Lee has worked since 1997.3. as a prominent Attorney in the legal service field including tax, law, patent, immigration, transaction across the border. You can find more at http://taxnlaw.co.kr

2013년 6월 7일 금요일

Per stirpes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Per stirpes (/pɜr ˈstɜrpz/; "by branch") is a legal term in Latin. An estate of a decedent is distributed per stirpes, if each branch of the family is to receive an equal share of an estate. When the heir in the first generation of a branch predeceased the decedent, the share that would have been given to the heir would be distributed among the heir's issue in equal shares. It may also be known as right of representation distribution, and differs from distribution per capita as members of the same generation may inherit different amounts.[1]

Contents

  [hide

Examples [edit]

Figure 1. A's estate is divided equally between each of the three branches. BC and D each receive one third. As B pre-deceased AB's two children - B1 and B2 - each receive one half of B's share, equivalent to one-sixth of the estate.
Example 1A: The testator A, specifies in his will that his estate is to be divided among his descendants in equal shares per stirpesA has three children, BC, and DB is already dead, but has left two children (grandchildren of A), B1 andB2. When A's will is executed, under a distribution per stirpesC and D each receive one-third of the estate, and B1 and B2 each receive one-sixth. B1 and B2 constitute one "branch" of the family, and collectively receive a share equal to the shares received by C and D as branches (figure 1).
Example 1B: If grandchild B1 had predeceased A, leaving two children B1a and B1b, and grandchild B2 had also died leaving three children B2aB2b and B2c, then distribution per stirpes would give one-third each to C and D, one-twelfth each to B1a and B1b, who would constitute a branch, and one-eighteenth each to B2aB2b and B2c. Thus, the BC, and D branches receive equal shares of the whole estate, the B1 and B2 branches receive equal shares of the B branch's share,B1a and B1b receive equal shares of the B1 branch's share, and B2aB2b and B2c receive equal shares of the B2 branch's share.

Per capita at each generation [edit]

Per capita at each generation is an alternative way of distribution, where heirs of the same generation will each receive the same amount. The estate is divided into equal shares at the generation closest to the deceased with surviving heirs. The number of shares is equal to the number of original members either surviving or with surviving descendants. Each surviving heir of that generation gets a share. The remainder is then equally divided among the next-generation descendants of the deceased descendants in the same manner.
Example 2A: In the first example, children C and D survive, so the estate is divided at their generation. There were three children, so each surviving child receives one-third. The remainder - B's share - is then divided in the same manner amongB's surviving descendants. The result is the same as under per stirpes because B's one-third is distributed to B1 and B2 (one-sixth to each).
Figure 2. Comparison between per stirpes inheritance and per capita by generation inheritance. On the left, each branch receives one third of the estate. On the right, A's only surviving descendant, C, receives one third of the estate. The remaining two thirds are divided between the descendants in the next generation.
Example 2A: The per capita and per stirpes results would differ if D also pre-deceased with one child, D1 (figure 2). Under per stirpesB1 and B2 would each receive one-sixth (half of B's one-third share), and D1 would receive one-third (all of D's one-third share). Under per capita, the two-thirds remaining after C's one-third share was taken would be divided equally among all three children of Band D. Each would receive two-ninths: B1B2, and D1 would all receive two-ninths.
Notes:
  • To give the effect indicated in these examples the clause should also include a provision that no beneficiary being a grandchild or remoter descendant will take a share if his or her parent is alive and takes a share.
  • The spouses of the children (that is, spouses of BC, and D) are not considered. Spouses are not a part of the branch. Therefore, even if BC, or D died leaving a spouse as well as children, all (100%) of the assets pass to the children and (0%) nothing passes to the spouses of A's children BC, and D. From the example above, if A's child B died before A's death, A's grandchildren B1and B2 would each receive half of B's share. Even if B had a living spouse at the time of A's death, that person would receive nothing from A's estate.

Modifications [edit]

At least in one state, New York, a statute modified this definition. Under New York law, the number of branches is determined by reference to the generation nearest the testator which has a surviving descendant. Thus, in the first example, if C and D also are already dead, and each left one child, named (respectively and appropriately) C1 and D1, then each of B1B2C1 and D1 would receive one quarter of the estate. This method is actually applied by the states of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, and West Virginia.
Texas also uses this 'modified' version of per stirpes distribution. Although the caption of Texas Probate Code §43 contains the phrase 'per stirpes,' the distribution method described is actually what is known as "per capita with representation." The distribution method for New York (based on the description above) would also be called "per capita with representation."

References [edit]

  1. ^ Henry Campbell Black. "Black's Law Dictionary"2nd Edition. West Publishing. Retrieved 10 December 2012.

External links [edit]

Help improve this page

Did you find what you were looking for?

이 블로그 검색